The patient with essential tremor, what therapy is possible?
notes by dr Claudio Italiano
cf also paziente con tremori
The patient with essential tremor is the subject for whom the diagnosis of
Parkinson's disease has not been established. It represents the "grave" of the
neurologist who does not know which treatment to prescribe. And it is not easy
to control a patient with essential tremor: if he is nervous he starts to
tremble more, sweats, has vertigo, difficulty in maintaining posture,
constipation, difficulty in swallowing and breathing. What to do? What drugs to
use?
Drugs for essential tremor
The drugs that are used are:
Beta blockers
Barbiturates
Calcium antagonists
Flunarizine
Clonidine
gabapentin
Propranolol
Several small randomized trials have found that compared to placebo, propranolol
(60-240 mg), administered for one month, improves short-term clinical parameters
such as tremor amplitude and subjectively assessed gravity. There are no
long-term randomized studies on the efficacy of propranolol in essential tremor.
Side effects of asthenia and bradycardia (for example, 1/10 in a randomized
trial). At other times, depression, diarrhea, dyspnoea, sedation, blurred vision
and sexual disorders were reported by less than 5% of subjects receiving
propranolol therapy. Individuals with congestive heart failure, second-degree
block, asthma, severe allergies and type 1 diabetes were usually excluded from
studies. All studies were small. Finally, the possibility of publication bias
can not be excluded.
Beta-blockers other than propranolol
Four small, randomized, short-term studies found only weak evidence that sotalol
and atenolol are effective in the treatment of essential hand tremor. We found
no adequate evidence of direct comparison between propranolol and other
beta-blockers. However, several small randomized trials have found that compared
to placebo, propranolol (60-240 mg) given for one month improves clinical
parameters such as tremor amplitude and subjectively assessed gravity in the
short term. We did not find long-term randomized studies on the efficacy of
propranolol in essential tremor but clinical experience encourages us to say
that it controls tremor in dysphoric subjects. Attention to administer it in
cardiac patients with hypokinetic arrhythmias because of the side effects.
Barbiturates
Two small randomized trials with short follow-up found that primidone improved
clinical parameters compared to placebo. A small randomized study with a short
follow-up found that phenobarbital improved clinical parameters compared to
placebo. We have not found long-term studies of this type. Primidone compared to
placebo significantly improved clinical parameters and subjective assessment of
tremor severity (P <0.05). In another study (22 subjects) primidone (maximum
dose 750 mg) compared to placebo significantly improved clinical parameters (P
<0.02), functionality test (P <0.01) and subjective evaluation (P <0.01 ).
However, some patients taking primidone had to discontinue therapy due to side
effects (acute first dose toxic reaction, sedation, daytime sleepiness, asthenia
and depression). Other barbiturates: Both primidone (metabolised to
phenobarbital) and phenobarbital are associated with depression and negative
effects on cognition and behavior (in particular, in children, the elderly and
in subjects with neuropsychiatric disorders
Benzodiazepines
Two randomized trials with a short follow-up provided limited evidence of the
low efficacy of benzodiazepines in essential hand tremor. Clonazepam vs placebo:
A randomized study (15 subjects) found no significant difference in the various
outcomes. Alprazolam vs placebo: A randomized double-blind study (24 subjects)
found that alprazolam (up to 3 mg daily) compared to placebo improved the
overall impression of the physician, but did not produce significant differences
in clinical parameters, in tests of functionality or in the self-assessment of
tremor.
Cannabinoids
Refer to the page on cannabis.
Methazolamide
A randomized trial did not provide evidence of the efficacy of metazolamide
compared to placebo. POSITIVE EFFECTS We did not find systematic reviews.
Metazolamide vs placebo: We have identified a randomized study with a
double-blind crossover design (25 subjects with essential tremor). The study
found no significant differences between metazolamide (up to 300 mg per day) and
placebo in terms of clinical parameters, functional tasks and self-assessment
(7/18 improved with metazolamide, 39%, vs 4/18 with placebo, 22%; reduction of
absolute risk 16%, 95% confidence limits from 15 to 45).
Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists
Three randomized trials of poor methodological quality that compared calcium
antagonists and placebo have reported inconsistent results. Nicardipine vs
placebo: We have identified 2 randomized trials. A double-blind crossover design
study (11 subjects) found no significant differences between nicardipine and
placebo in accelerometric recordings. Clinical outcomes were not taken into
consideration. The second study with crossover design (14 subjects) compared for
one month nicardipine (1 mg / kg per day), propranolol (160 mg daily) and
placebo. Both nicardipine and propranolol improved symptom scores compared to
placebo. Nimodipine vs placebo: We identified a randomized study with a
double-blind crossover design (15 subjects), which found no significant
difference between nimodipine (90 mg daily) and placebo in the clinical score
after 2 weeks of treatment (absolute risk reduction) 20%, 95% confidence limits
from -15% to + 55%). With regard to the side effects, both nicardipine and
nimodipine may exacerbate or cause heart failure. They are associated with
vertigo, flushing, peripheral edema, somnolence, headache and asthenia. Adverse
gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, constipation, weight gain,
thirst, indigestion or taste alteration) are reported in 1-3% of the population.
Changes in laboratory values (hepatic function) were generally observed 1 to 8
weeks after initiation of treatment.
Flunarizine
A small randomized trial found evidence that flunarizine could reduce the
symptoms of essential hand tremor. We did not find systematic
reviews.Flunarizine vs placebo: We identified a randomized study with a
double-blind crossover design (17 subjects). The study found that flunarizine
(10 mg daily) compared to placebo significantly improved clinical parameters and
tremor severity after one month of treatment (P = 0.0006). The majority of
subjects who completed the study had improved with flunarizine (13/15), while
the number of those who improved with placebo was not reported. Flunarizine,
however, is associated with neuropsychiatric side effects and the development of
parkinsonism and other movement disorders.
Clonidine
A randomized study has not documented any improvement in essential hand tremor
after clonidine treatment. POSITIVE EFFECTS Clonidine vs placebo: We did not
find systematic reviews. We identified a small randomized trial (10 subjects),
with short-term follow-up and crossover design, which compared clonidine (maximum
0.6 mg per day) and placebo. The study found no significant difference in the
number of subjects improved (1/10 with clonidine, 10%, vs 1/10 with placebo,
Gabapentin
Three small randomized trials with short follow-up found contradictory evidence
on the efficacy of gabapentin in the essential tremor of the hand. We did not
find systematic reviews. Gabapentin vs placebo: We have identified 3 randomized
studies with crossover and small design (16-25 subjects). The first study found
no differences between gabapentin and placebo in terms of clinical parameters,
daily activities or self-assessment. The second study compared gabapentin (up to
1,200 mg per day), propranolol (up to 120 mg per day) and placebo. With respect
to placebo, gabapentin improved the number of positive responses to treatment
(10/16 with gabapentin, 63% vs 5/16 with placebo, 31%, reduction of absolute
risk 32%, 95% confidence limits from 17% to 47%). %, number of cases to be
treated 4, 95% confidence limits from 2 to 6), clinical score (P <0.05),
disability (P <0.01), self-assessment (P <0, 06) and accelerometric registration
The third study (25 subjects) compared 2 doses of gabapentin (1,800 mg or 3,600
mg daily) with placebo. The study found no significant differences with the
different dosages of gabapentin in the 20 subjects who completed the study.
Gabapentin (at both doses) significantly improved the overall assessment of the
participants (P <0.05), the ability to pour water (P <0.05) and the scores in
the activities of daily life (P <0.05) compared to placebo. 0.005). The study
did not report any specific hand tremor scores; no significant differences were
found between gabapentin and placebo in the scores on accelerometry, spirography
or overall impression of the physician.
index topics of neurology