doctor's notes Claudio Italiano
Search for autoantibodies
-Anti-Sm: highly specific for LES; the clinical sensitivity varies from 15 to
30%. High titles have greater diagnostic significance.
-Anti-U1RNP: not specific. Present in 30-40% of patients with SLE; high-quality
are an essential diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of MCTD.
-Anti-SSA / Ro: not specific. In patients with SS there are up to 60% if tested
with immunodiffusion and up to 90% if tested with ELISA; they are more
frequently associated with extraglandular involvement. They can also be present
in about 30% of patients with SLE. High ELISA titers, especially for anti-Ro 52,
are a risk factor for neonatal lupus.
-Anti-SSV / La: not spefic. Both in patients with SS and those with SLE, they
are present less frequently than SSA / Ro antibodies. They are associated with a
higher incidence of cutaneous forms, vasculitis, leukopenia and lymphopenia, and
neonatal lupus.
-Anti-centromere: associated with limited SSc. 32% sensitivity in all patients
with SSc; 57% in limited SSc; high specificity.
-Anti-topoisomerase I (Scl70): associated with diffuse SSc. Clinical sensitivity
variable, depending on the method, from 25 to 70%; analytical sensitivity
94-99%. High clinical specificity; analytical specificity ranging from 70 to
99%, depending on the method.
-Anti-Jo-1: specific for PM / DM. Sensitivity from 8 to 40%. Associated with
pulmonary interstitiopathy and arthritis
Anti-ENA autoantibody specificities
-Anti-PM-Slc: is associated with SSc with myopathy.
-Anti-U3-RNP (fibrillarin): is present in 4-8% of patients with SSc.
-Anti-RNA polymerase I: is more frequent in progressive forms of SSc.
-Anti-polymerase III: common in SSc.
-Anti-ThTo: is associated with SSc with limited skin involvement.
-Anti-protein ribosomal P: is associated with LES and, in particular with
greater frequency, to forms with psychotic manifestations.
-Anti-PCNA: it is associated with LES in active phase
The most specific use of laboratory tests in the definition of a rheumatic
disease is based on the search for autoantibodies, as an expression of the
autoimmune organism, which is the basis of many rheumatic diseases. In
particular, autoantibodies are expressed against the autoantigens. , which are
normally found constituents:
in the nucleus
in the cytoplasm of all cells,
in the cytoplasm of neutrophil granulocytes.
Correspondingly there are anti-nucleic autoantibodies (ANA), anti-DNA,
extractable anti-nuclear antigens (ENA), anti-cytoplasm of neutrophil
granulocytes (ANCA) and anti-phospholipids (aPL).
ANAs are directed towards nucleocytoplasmic antigens present in all human cells,
unlike autoantibodies of organ-specific autoimmune diseases, such as pernicious
anemia, autoimmune thyroiditis, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis
etc. which autoantibodies to specific antigens of the single organ involved are
found. The positivity of ANA research is considered one of the main
characteristics of systemic autoimmune diseases, so much so that some of them
fall within the diagnostic and classification criteria of the same diseases.
The research of ANA finds its clinical significance in the phase of:
a) diagnostic screening, because it has a function of diagnostic element or
criterion;
b) deepening for the definition of subgroup or subset of systemic autoimmune
disease (MAIS), eg the presence of autoantibodies towards CENP-B or Scl70 leads
towards a clinical classification of localized or diffuse systemic sclerosis;
SES-associated psychosis has a specific marker in anti p-ribosomal antibody;
c) monitoring, to define a follow-up of the course and / or of the disease, with
significant variations in the degree of positivity.
ANA research must be motivated by a clinical suspicion or a risk factor for MAIS
(autoimmune diseases):
DsDNA Nucleic Acids
Proteins associated with DNA Histones
Ku
PCNA
Centomeric proteins
Topoisomerase I (Scl70)
Proteins associated with RNA Spliceosomal proteins
Nucleic proteins
Core-cytoplasmic prot
The research of ANA has meaning because, if carried out with the appropriate
analytical technique, such as indirect immunofluorescence, it allows, on the
basis of the title and the fluoroscopic picture identified, the direction
towards a specific rheumatic pathology.
Fluoroscopic images concern HEp-2 human epithelial cells, used for ANA research:
fluoroscopic appearance is defined based on the identified bright green
immunofluorescence.
Positive ANA positives can be represented by:
- a nucleolar positivity,
- a speckled positivity, that is, dotted,
- homogeneous positivity,
- a positivity to diffuse granulitis.
The different positivity allows the identification of the involved autoantigen
and the orientation of the clinician towards a defined clinical form, as
schematized in the following tables.
ANA-IFA positivity
Homogeneous · nDNA Anticentromere · CENP-B
Speckled · Sm · RNP · SSA · SSB
Nucleolar · PMScl · RNA polymerase · Fibrillarin · Ku - To / Th
Diffuse grainy
Topoisomerases I PCNA · Cyclin
in particular we will have in the various pathologies:
Homogeneous ANA → LES, Rheumatoid Arthritis
ANA diffused granulosis → Systemic sclerosis
ANA speckled → Mixed Connectivity (Sharp's)
ANA end speckled → Sjögren's syndrome
ANA PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) → LES
ANA anticentromere → Systemic sclerosis (CREST or localized variant)
Nucleus ANA → Systemic Sclerosis
The predictability, ie the ability to identify a specific pathology, of ANAs
is not absolute, depending on the influence of factors such as:
- clinical context (age, sex, diseases, drugs), so the positivity in a
80-year-old woman has a different meaning than the positivity in a 2-year-old
girl or in a male compared to a female, finally there is the possibility of
iatrogenic forms for which account should also be taken of the use of certain
drugs in the clinical history sheet;
- analytical method used: immunofluorescence is a difficult and not very
accessible method, but more predictive than others;
- fluoroscopic pattern: some are pathognomonic, markers of the disease;
- title of positivity: obviously a 1: 2480 positivity is much more significant
than one
positivity 1:80; an ANA positivity (low titre) can easily be found in the
following pathological and paraphysiological conditions:
neoplasms
leukemia
acute and chronic renal failure
kidney disease
viral infections (EBV, HIV)
healthy subjects (pregnancy, females> 40 years, elderly)
- persistence over time: certain viral infections (Cytomegalovirus,
Hepstein-Barr virus), mixed polyclonal drugs or activations may result in a
transient increase in autoantibodies.
The research of the ENAs should be understood as a II level survey for the
identification of autoantibody specificities after the finding of ANA positivity,
as the search for native DNA antibodies finds meaning in the patients in whom
ANA-type positivity has already been found homogeneous and speckled with high
titre, compatible with the presence of antibodies to DNA. The quantification of
these antibodies is useful in the clinical and therapeutic monitoring of
patients with SLE because there is a close relationship between title or better
international units and activity of the disease itself.
In conclusion, the most useful laboratory tests for the diagnosis, prognosis and
monitoring of rheumatic diseases are:
¨ diagnosis: identification of disease markers (CCP, FR, ANA, DNA, ENA)
¨ prognosis: quantitative DNA, clinical subset markers, bio-temporal
examinations
¨ monitoring: quantitative DNA, CRP, bio-temporal examinations for organ
pathology.